| # | Group A | MP | W | L | S | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ziraat Bankasi | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:3 | 18 | |
| 2. | Trentino | 6 | 4 | 2 | 13:10 | 11 | |
| 3. | ACH Ljubljana | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6:15 | 4 | |
| 4. | Tours | 6 | 1 | 5 | 8:17 | 3 | |
| # | Group B | MP | W | L | S | Pts | Form |
| 1. | Lublin | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:7 | 15 | |
| 2. | Roeselare | 6 | 3 | 3 | 15:14 | 10 | |
| 3. | Galatasaray | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11:15 | 7 | |
| 4. | Halkbank | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9:17 | 4 | |
| # | Group C | MP | W | L | S | Pts | Form |
| 1. | Perugia | 6 | 6 | 0 | 18:4 | 17 | |
| 2. | Guaguas | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:14 | 8 | |
| 3. | BR Volleys | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10:12 | 8 | |
| 4. | VK Lvi Prague | 6 | 0 | 6 | 8:18 | 3 | |
| # | Group D | MP | W | L | S | Pts | Form |
| 1. | Zawiercie | 6 | 5 | 1 | 15:4 | 15 | |
| 2. | Rzeszow | 6 | 3 | 3 | 12:9 | 9 | |
| 3. | Luneburg | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7:14 | 6 | |
| 4. | Sporting CP | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7:14 | 6 | |
| # | Group E | MP | W | L | S | Pts | Form |
| 1. | Lube Civitanova | 6 | 5 | 1 | 17:5 | 15 | |
| 2. | Montpellier | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12:10 | 10 | |
| 3. | Projekt Warszawa | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13:11 | 10 | |
| 4. | Haasrode Leuven | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2:18 | 1 | |
| # | Ranking of third-placed teams | MP | W | L | S | Pts | Form |
| 1. | Projekt Warszawa | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13:11 | 10 | |
| 2. | BR Volleys | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10:12 | 8 | |
| 3. | Galatasaray | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11:15 | 7 | |
| 4. | Luneburg | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7:14 | 6 | |
| 5. | ACH Ljubljana | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6:15 | 4 |